, Salem, MA

Local News

April 11, 2014

Judge backs NOAA on state's fishing lawsuit

Ruling rejects state's challenges over science, impact


The judge specifically referenced the 2012 instance when NMFS refused to consider the offer of a fishing industry-supplied survey vessel to check the survey data collected by the government’s new survey vessel, the Bigelow, that served as the basis for the 2013 cuts.

Fishermen and fishing advocates believed that data to be highly flawed and offered to perform a side-by-side trawl with the Bigelow as a method of corroborating or countering the government data.

“The issue boils down to this: whether NMFS’ refusal to deploy an additional, fishing industry-supplied survey vessel as a check on the accuracy of the Bigelow amounted to a failure to resort to the “best scientific information available” in formulating the groundfish stock assessments,” Stearns wrote in his opinion. “Despite NMFS’ rejection of a side-by-side trawling, prior to undertaking the 2012 assessment, NOAA conducted extensive calibration experiments to detect any survey disparities between the results achieved by the Bigelow and [its predecessor] Albatross.”

While Stearns said the side-by-side trawl was “a proven methodology that NMFS could have deployed,” he added that NMFS was under no “affirmative obligation” to collect new data.

“Because the imperative imposed on the agency by Congress is one of urgent action, and not the achievement of fishery science perfection, the agency may — indeed must — act in times of perceived emergency on ‘incomplete or imperfect data’,” Stearns wrote. “Here, there is no record (of) evidence that more accurate stock assessments were obtained and ignored, nor any compelling evidence that the dismaying assessment results were the product of flawed data collection rather than an accurate science-based portrait of groundfish stocks in a state of imminent collapse.”

Rothschild said Stearns ruling also failed appropriately grasp that the plaintiffs clearly showed contrary evidence that called NOAA scientific method and results into question.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News

AP Video
Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN Raw: Deadly Landslide Hits Indian Village Obama Chides House GOP for Pursuing Lawsuit New Bill Aims to Curb Sexual Assault on Campus Russia Counts Cost of New US, EU Sanctions 3Doodler Bring 3-D Printing to Your Hand Six PA Cops Indicted for Robbing Drug Dealers Britain Testing Driverless Cars on Roadways Raw: Thousands Flocking to German Crop Circle At Least 20 Chikungunya Cases in New Jersey Raw: Obama Eats Ribs in Kansas City In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast Raw: Otters Enjoy Water Slides at Japan Zoo NCAA Settles Head-injury Suit, Will Change Rules Raw: Japanese Soldiers Storm Beach in Exercises Raw: Weapons Fire Hits UN School in Gaza Raw: Rocket Launches Into Space With Cargo Ship Broken Water Main Floods UCLA
Comments Tracker