SalemNews.com, Salem, MA

Local News

January 29, 2014

Judge rules Bettencourt not entitled to pension

Dismisses former police lieutenant's claim of excessive fine

PEABODY — It’s been nearly a decade since then-Peabody police Lt. Edward Bettencourt got nosy while working as the watch commander on the midnight shift on Christmas 2004.

To this day, no one knows for sure why he used the Social Security numbers and birth dates of 21 colleagues to create bogus online accounts that let him take a peek at their Civil Service exam scores. In 2008, after a jury-waived trial, he was convicted of 21 counts of improperly accessing a computer.

The punishment in the case was a $10,500 fine.

But when state retirement officials moved to take away Bettencourt’s pension, estimated at being worth between $659,000 and $1 million, based on misconduct in the course of his employment as a police officer, that touched off another legal battle.

Last week, a Suffolk Superior Court judge ruled that the forfeiture of the pension was not a violation of Bettencourt’s Eighth Amendment protection against an “excessive fine.” He dismissed Bettencourt’s appeal.

In a ruling that is likely to be further appealed, Judge Garry Inge concluded that because a pension is something that is contingent on a public employee’s completion of service without engaging in criminal misconduct related to the job, withdrawing it is not the same as imposing a “fine.”

Inge, who reviewed cases from around the country and the U.S. Court of Appeals, concluded that “forfeiture of a pension pursuant to (Massachusetts law) is not a payment to a sovereign considered as a fine for the purposes of the Eighth Amendment.”

The question of whether Bettencourt’s snooping was related to his job was also the subject of lengthy court proceedings. After a Peabody District Court judge concluded that it was not job-related, the Public Employee Retirement Administration Commission appealed.

Ultimately, the state Appeals Court concluded that Bettencourt’s actions were related to his employment. But in the same ruling, the court ruled that Bettencourt was entitled to a hearing on the issue of whether the pension forfeiture violated his Eighth Amendment rights.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News

AP Video
Raw: Magnitude-7.2 Earthquake Shakes Mexico City Ceremony at MIT Remembers One of Boston's Finest Raw: Students Hurt in Colo. School Bus Crash Raw: Church Tries for Record With Chalk Jesus Raw: Faithful Celebrate Good Friday Worldwide Deadly Avalanche Sweeps Slopes of Mount Everest Police Arrest Suspect in Highway Shootings Drought Concerns May Hurt Lake Tourism Vermont Goat Meat Gives Refugees Taste of Home Calif. Investigators Re-construct Fatal Bus Cras Mayor Rob Ford Launches Re-election Campaign Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case Author Gabriel Garcia Marquez Dead at 87 Chelsea Clinton Is Pregnant Flamingo Frenzy Ahead of Zoo Construction Crew Criticized Over Handling of Ferry Disaster Agreement Reached to Calm Ukraine Tensions Boston Bombing Survivors One Year Later
Comments Tracker