SalemNews.com, Salem, MA

Opinion

December 27, 2006

More local taxes won't save anyone money

Local governments wail endlessly that they don't have enough money. So why would anyone believe that allowing them to create new taxes will give homeowners a break on their property taxes?

It won't happen. Give local government more money and it will spend every penny of it - on more employees and equipment, on raises and benefits in municipal union contracts, by any wasteful and capricious means available.

Incoming Gov. Deval Patrick during his campaign touted "local option" taxes as a means to reduce property taxes. Local option taxes mean adding a local component to state taxes such as those on meals or hotel rooms. A community might, for example, increase the 5 percent state meals tax to 6 percent on its restaurants. The state would still get the 5 percent on the value of meals served while the town would keep the additional 1 percent.

Patrick has suggested such taxes would help communities reduce their dependence on the property tax. His finance chief Leslie Kirwan has suggested local option taxes would be part of the Patrick administration's policy.

The problem in municipal governments is not that they collect too little money. It's that they spend too much. Even with the minimal reductions in the rate of growth of local aid during the Romney administration, few communities have shown any real fiscal discipline. Managers, mayors and selectmen continue to approve generous contracts for teachers, police, firefighters and other municipal employees. They cave to union demands that expensive benefit packages cannot be altered with other forms of compensation.



Local administrators have been able to get away with this fiscal irresponsibility because growth in the number of homes in their communities and increasing home values have allowed them to take ever more in taxes from homeowners. Where homeowners balk at rapidly increasing taxes, local leaders shift the burden to businesses through tax classification. That system permits two property tax rates, one for homeowners and another, higher rate for businesses.

With the housing market hitting its peak, this shell game cannot continue. Giving local communities another source of tax revenue isn't going to save anyone any money. It will simply give local government carte blanche to continue its free-spending ways.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion

Nelson Benton Twitter Updates
Follow me on Twitter
Salem News Opinion Poll
AP Video
Denver's Largest-Ever Drug Bust Nets Dozens Marines: No Punishment for Nazi-like Flag Vets Look to Translate Military Skills Into Jobs Expert: Removing LA School's Staff 'Appropriate' Raw Video: School Bus Burst Into Flames LA School Reopens Amid Sex Abuse Scandal $25B Settlement Reached Over Foreclosure Abuses Pentagon: Allow Women Closer to Front Lines Obama Gives Education Waivers to 10 States Giffords Aide to Run for Her Seat LA School in Sex Abuse Scandal Reopens Winter Slamming North Asia, Parts of Europe Syrian Forces Renew Bombardment of Homs States, Banks Reach Foreclosure-abuse Settlement Raw Video: Italy's Mount Etna Bursts Into Life Greeks March; Angry Despite Debt Deal Raw Video: U.S. Pullout Celebration Raw Video: Annual Empire State Building Run-Up Man Killed in Courthouse Shootout Air Force Airlines: Leaders Get Polished Service
Comments Tracker
Roll Call
Helium debate
Helium