SalemNews.com, Salem, MA

Opinion

May 13, 2008

Letter: Homeowners can't afford another tax hike

To the editor:

The Salem News editorial of Thursday, May 8, ("Vote no on Hamilton-Wenham school override") gives credence to the economic facts that have been articulated objectively by the override opponents.

Nine comparable towns in this region — Hamilton, Wenham, Topsfield, Boxford, Essex, Rowley, Ipswich, Newbury and Manchester — have a tax rate per thousand that spans from a low end of the spectrum with Manchester at $7.53 per thousand to Hamilton's $13.39 per thousand. The weighted average of these nine towns is $10.63 per thousand, which means that Hamilton is higher than the mean by $2.76 per thousand.

For a median house valued at $450,800, the premium — or competitive cost disadvantage of Hamilton's property tax structure — is $1,244.20 annually, or over $100 per month to the average homeowner.

If the override passes in 2008, Hamilton's tax rate would jump to $14.76 per thousand. Even if the weighted average of the nine towns increased to approximately $11.10 per thousand, the gap for Hamilton taxpayers would widen to approximately $3.66 per thousand. (This is based on a conservative estimate of a nine-town, average tax rate increase of 4.42 percent, with the Hamilton and Wenham overrides.) According to Hamilton's Finance Committee, the impact on a median-priced house of $450,800 would be $616 per year, not the $393 figure that has been sent all over town by advocates of the school override.

Therefore, if the override is adopted by the voters in Hamilton this Thursday (May 15), the premium paid by homeowners to live in this town will increase from $1,244.20 to about $1,650 per year or $137.50 per month. While proponents of the override will make global comparisons on how much Massachusetts spends on education compared to national trends, the nine-town comparison is much more relevant and germane to the pocketbook issues confronting Hamilton's homeowners.

Finally, it was highlighted by the School Department how many teachers would be lost if the override did not pass; however, they have not told the voters what the net increase in the number of teachers might be, over the 192 teachers that are currently reported in the school system by the Massachusetts Department of Education.

While an override of this magnitude was acknowledged by a town selectman to be unsustainable, the advocates of more school spending and the superintendent of schools have not subscribed to this philosophy or reality. The Salem News, to its credit, weighed both arguments carefully and opined editorially on the side of fiscal responsibility.

The voters in Hamilton and Wenham should heed this advice and send the override back to the drawing board for reconsideration.

Robert A. Baker

Hamilton

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion

Nelson Benton Twitter Updates
Follow me on Twitter
Salem News Opinion Poll
AP Video
Man Killed in Courthouse Shootout Video of Ga. Man Who Killed Girl Released Air Force Airlines: Leaders Get Polished Service Ga Girl Fights Off Kidnapper at Walmart Nevada Highway Patrol, City Settle Beating Case White House Attacks Romney on Birth Control Homs Bombardment Continues, Global Outcry Grows Mo. Teen Gets Life Sentence for Killing Girl, 9 Lower-hassle Screening to Be Tested at Airports Raw Video: Dog Rescued From Icy Colo. Water Helmet Camera Captures Calif. Fire Rescue Worker Tells 911: Powell 'exploded the House' Triple Win: Santorum Takes Minn., Mo., Colo. Injured Marine Inspired by Homecoming No Rape Charges Against Son of NYPD Commissioner Egypt's Ruling Generals Play Risky Game With US Former Komen Exec Defends Funding Cut Skip the Coffee Cup and Inhale Your Caffeine Fix Calif. Gay Marriage Ban Ruled Unconstitutional Jury Selection for Ex-UVa Athlete Enters 2nd Day
Comments Tracker
Roll Call
Helium debate
Helium