Salem’s City Council is once again discussing a raise for the mayor — and by extension, themselves.
It is always an awkward conversation, because the councilors’ salary is linked to the mayor’s. They automatically get 10 percent of what the mayor gets. In this case, new Ward 4 Councilor David Eppley proposed an amendment — accepted by a council subcommittee — that their own raise not take effect until 2016, after the next City Council election.
That was a good first step.
But we hope councilors will take it a step further and end the unnecessary linkage between the mayor’s salary and their own. The two jobs are not related, and there is no reason why a raise for one should prompt a raise for the other, except that it’s politically easier.
The mayor is a full-time public employee who puts her private career aside to run a city of 42,000 people with a $136 million budget. Although it’s an elected office, it is also a professional position, with oversight of hundreds of municipal employees. When it comes to salary, the mayor deserves to be treated as the top manager in a large organization, and that includes regular raises that keep the salary competitive enough to attract top talent.
City councilors are not full-time employees. They keep their day jobs, where they earn their own salaries, and perform a part-time public service as elected officials. They don’t supervise any employees, manage any departments or have responsibility for anything other than their own votes. No one supervises them, and there are no set hours or work rules.
That is not to denigrate the importance — or the work ethic — of city councilors. It’s just a fact of life. It is not the same kind of position as the mayor’s, and there’s no reason for councilors to expect regular raises or automatic increases, or for the public to grant them on a regular basis.