, Salem, MA


February 17, 2014

Letter: Buffer zones needed to protect women

To the editor:

As a woman from Massachusetts, it is alarming to read that the Supreme Court is questioning the constitutionality of the buffer zones outside abortion clinics.

Without the buffer zone, protesters can stand in front of doorways harassing and often preventing people from safely getting inside the clinics. While Justice Anthony Kennedy is right that he has a duty to “protect speech that’s lawful,” women should also have the right to be protected from harm’s way when making decisions regarding their own body.

Since the buffer zone was put in place after a history of violence near abortion clinics in Massachusetts, women deserve that it remain intact so they do not fall victim to such acts of violent crimes. The fact that two people were killed outside of an abortion clinic in 1994 is proof enough that this law was put in place for a reason. And those who oppose its existence because there has not been evidence of recent incidents have a flawed argument, because perhaps the law is what is preventing these acts from occurring any longer.

The buffer zone is a safety issue rather than a free-speech issue, and it is my hope that the Supreme Court will keep them in place.

Katelyn S. Rein


Text Only | Photo Reprints

AP Video
Courts Conflicted Over Healthcare Law Holder Urges Bipartisanship on Immigration Raw: Truck, Train Crash Leads to Fireball US Airlines Cancel Israel Flights Obama Signs Workforce Training Law Crash Victims' Remains Reach Ukraine-held City Diplomatic Push Intensifies to End War in Gaza Obama Offers Condolences at Dutch Embassy Cat Fans Lap Up Feline Film Festival Raw: Lawmakers Scuffle in Ukraine's Parliament The Rock Finds His Inner 'Hercules' Michigan Plant's Goal: Flower and Die Raw: MH17 Passenger Remains in Kharkiv, Ukraine Raw: Israel Hits Gaza Targets, Destroys Mosques Veteran Creates Job During High Unemployment New Orleans Plans to Recycle Cigarette Butts
Comments Tracker
Roll Call
Helium debate