SalemNews.com, Salem, MA

Opinion

February 26, 2014

Our view: Power plant deal a win for Salem, region

After months of sometimes bitter back-and-forth, the Conservation Law Foundation and proponents of the proposed Footprint natural gas-fired power plant on the Salem waterfront managed to come together to move the project forward.

While both sides are claiming victory, the real winners here are the taxpayers of Salem and the residents of the North Shore — who count on a reliable source of electricity to help them live their daily lives — two constituencies often ignored by environmental puritans who favor ideology over people.

The agreement struck a blow for real-world environmentalism. Pie-in-the-sky calls to turn the contaminated 65-acre site into a park while relying on still-emerging wind and solar power to supply energy to tens of thousands of homes and businesses was never a workable solution for the city or the region.

Under the terms of an agreement reached last week, Footprint will keep the plant’s carbon dioxide emissions below 2,279,530 tons per year until 2025, and then at successively lower levels each year afterward. Footprint has also agreed to end the plant’s commercial operations by 2049 and shutter it completely within the following two years.

In exchange, the Conservation Law Foundation dropped its appeal of the state approval process for the proposed $800 million, 630-megawatt plant. The agreement was followed by a final approval from the state Energy Facilities Siting Board.

“The agreement shows how natural gas can be a tool for reducing greenhouse emissions if it is appropriately conditioned and constrained in a manner that is consistent with the need to decarbonize our energy system,” CLF attorney Shanna Cleveland said in a statement.

Let’s be clear here, however: The Footprint proposal was good to begin with. The old coal-and-oil fired plant will be removed, and the site will undergo a complete cleanup, with several acres open to public and private use for the first time in generations. Even before the new restrictions pushed by the CLF, the state-of-the-art plant promised to be a winner from an environmental standpoint, cutting CO2 emissions by 450,000 tons — the equivalent of taking 90,000 cars off the road.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion

AP Video
Disabled Veterans Memorial Nearing Completion Last Mass Lynching in U.S. Remains Unsolved Home-sharing Programs Help Seniors Ex-NYC Mayor: US Should Allow Flights to Israel Clinton: "AIDS-Free Generation Within Our Reach" Judge Ponders Overturning Colo. Gay Marriage Ban Airlines Halt Travel to Israel Amid Violence NYPD Chief Calls for 'use of Force' Retraining VA Nominee McDonald Goes Before Congress Bush: Don't Worry, Sugarland Isn't Breaking Up US Official: Most Migrant Children to Be Removed Police Probing Brooklyn Bridge Flag Switch CDC Head Concerned About a Post-antibiotic Era Raw: First Lady Says `Drink Up' More Water Courts Conflicted Over Healthcare Law Holder Urges Bipartisanship on Immigration Raw: Truck, Train Crash Leads to Fireball US Airlines Cancel Israel Flights Obama Signs Workforce Training Law Crash Victims' Remains Reach Ukraine-held City
Comments Tracker
Roll Call
Helium debate
Helium