, Salem, MA


December 24, 2013

Letter: Plant not a fit for progressive city

To the editor:

I am dismayed that despite scientific evidence about the urgency of controlling and rolling back the impact of global warming, we may be developing another fossil fuel plant in Salem, likely to chain us to fossil fuel for several generations. We are led to believe the choice is between a gas-fueled facility and a rusting, unused eyesore generating no tax revenue. I do not believe that there are no other possibilities for prime waterfront property in this progressive, thriving city. We must also consider pollution at the extraction source of the gas that would be used, as pollution knows no geographic boundaries.

Salem should join the realistic forward thinkers and be a leader in renewable energy strategies while developing more imaginative uses of the waterfront land. We need to put our focus and creative thinking into expediting energy conservation measures and renewables development rather than supporting another fossil-fuel facility.

Cynthia Hibberd


Text Only | Photo Reprints

AP Video
Two Women Narrowly Avoid Being Hit by Train In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast New Sanctions on Key Sectors of Russian Economy Crayola Announces Family Attraction in Orlando US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating
Comments Tracker
Roll Call
Helium debate