SalemNews.com, Salem, MA

Opinion

February 1, 2014

Letter: Voting 'Yes' on Brimbal Avenue

To the editor:

It strikes me as ironic that most of the objections to the Brimbal Avenue proposal repeatedly come down to how development will affect the driving patterns of those who already exclusively drive (not cycle or walk) along this street. Nowhere do I see lobbying for more public transit (buses, e.g.) or other alternative transportation infrastructure that could connect Beverly’s far-flung parts effectively, even though this would help lessen the need for everyone to drive everywhere all the time.

It’s also a fact that we all live on land that itself was once a “new” development, and that the development of our current neighborhoods included the destruction of greenfields and the building of arterial roads. It’s disingenuous for neighbors to think that after they signed mortgage papers, development just stops. Or that Beverly can afford not to change with the times.

Beverly has changed many times over the past centuries. I think we need to understand that Beverly is a formerly industrial (small) city, which is now once again re-urbanizing. Since it is a city, it also has its own suburbs — with all the tensions that brings. For example, a city needs money to provide services (including social services); this can’t be wished away. And we have an urban and industrial history that’s very different from some of our more bucolic neighbors. Beverly had independent shoe manufacturing businesses; it had a massive factory (USM) that manufactured the machines for making those shoes, which employed thousands and was a gateway for hardworking immigrants who contributed to the city’s ethnic diversity; it had munitions and armaments manufacturing during World War II and beyond; and it had all the usual businesses that carried over from before the Industrial Age (including waterfront occupations). In the later 20th century we lost the bulk of that industrial base (which incidentally helped push the city into a tailspin that resulted in junk bond status). And in the 20th century we also sprawled into the far-flung neighborhoods that sprang up on “virgin” territory to the north of downtown. Now that we’re re-urbanizing (trends indicate that people want to live in walkable, higher-density, and amenity-rich places), we really should develop in those places already zoned for it, and we should think about making our downtown more attractive for residential and commercial development.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion

AP Video
Disabled Veterans Memorial Nearing Completion Last Mass Lynching in U.S. Remains Unsolved Home-sharing Programs Help Seniors Ex-NYC Mayor: US Should Allow Flights to Israel Clinton: "AIDS-Free Generation Within Our Reach" Judge Ponders Overturning Colo. Gay Marriage Ban Airlines Halt Travel to Israel Amid Violence NYPD Chief Calls for 'use of Force' Retraining VA Nominee McDonald Goes Before Congress Bush: Don't Worry, Sugarland Isn't Breaking Up US Official: Most Migrant Children to Be Removed Police Probing Brooklyn Bridge Flag Switch CDC Head Concerned About a Post-antibiotic Era Raw: First Lady Says `Drink Up' More Water Courts Conflicted Over Healthcare Law Holder Urges Bipartisanship on Immigration Raw: Truck, Train Crash Leads to Fireball US Airlines Cancel Israel Flights Obama Signs Workforce Training Law Crash Victims' Remains Reach Ukraine-held City
Comments Tracker
Roll Call
Helium debate
Helium