SalemNews.com, Salem, MA

Opinion

April 25, 2012

Our View: Quick action needed on Chapter 90 funding

Over the predictable protests of the Republican minority, the House on Monday refused to take a quick vote on a likely unaffordable cut in the state sales tax. But lawmakers' failure to take timely action on a transportation borrowing bill is not nearly as forgivable, given the threat it presents to essential road and bridge projects throughout the commonwealth.

The failure by Democratic leaders in the House and Senate to reach agreement on a $1.5 billion transportation bond "could cost construction jobs and force cities and towns to delay infrastructure projects until next year," the State House News Service reported this week. The Senate favors the more comprehensive bill put forward by the Patrick administration, while House leaders would prefer a more limited package.

All parties are in agreement that Chapter 90 funding — essential for many local road projects — should be funded at $200 million.

With or without a conference committee, House and Senate leaders should reconcile their differences quickly, or at least pass a separate bill authorizing the Chapter 90 funding before we're halfway through the construction season. An early spring doesn't help municipalities if the money for essential projects remains stuck on Beacon Hill.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion

AP Video
Raw: 1 Dead in Shooting at Mo. Apartment Complex Raw: Huge Fire Near Yosemite National Park Raw: Obama Arrives in Berlin 3 Charged in Ohio With Enslaving Mom, Daughter Obama Seeks G-8 Support on Syria Raw: Volcano Erupts Near Mexico City Kid Couture: Spending Big Bucks on Babies Suicide Bombs Target Baghdad Mosque, Killing 29 Military Plans to Put Women in Combat Jobs Solar Power Chargers in NYC Parks Civil Rights Groups Sue NYPD Over Muslim Spying Raw: First Lady, Daughters Enjoy Irish Sights RAW: NSA Director Says 50 Plots Foiled Boeing, Airbus Battle for Sales Supremacy NYC 911 Call Lasts for 8 Hours
Comments Tracker
Roll Call
Helium debate
Helium