, Salem, MA


February 26, 2011

Online blogging or online flogging?

I commend The Salem News for instituting a real-names policy for the comments section of Being an online reader for quite some time, I have enjoyed this convenient format for easy access to issues and events in the community. However, the endless rants from a small gang of anonymous or pseudonymous users have become a serious distraction to the integrity of these reports. Many comments provide incomplete or inaccurate information and a "spin" on topics that are often not even relevant to the article.

More disconcerting is that some bloggers often resort to what can be referred to as grammar school behavior of bullying and name-calling; some border on slander. These actions constrain others from submitting comments and deter meaningful discussion. Others fear or decline to submit or even be mentioned in an article because of the likelihood of being trashed in the comment section. In essence, by providing some with a veil of secrecy, online blogging has turned into online flogging with some parallels to a modern-day Ku Klux Klan.

Supporters of anonymity state the right to freedom of speech by citing the revolutionary methods used by founding fathers prior to becoming a nation and thus having a Bill of Rights. This argument is at best a stretch of what is meant by freedom of speech and is not the intent of The Salem News. People who want to provide commentary on any issue or article can do so. In fact, exercising freedom of speech is actually encouraged by The Salem News in the "Letters to the Editor" section. As evidenced by this author's comments, these submissions are published with full disclosure and without edit of content.

Yet online bloggers expect these same privileges without these same responsibilities. If people do not have the courage to identify themselves by their given name, of what value are their remarks? Who are they and what are their background and qualifications that make them authorities on so many issues? Such information is necessary and important in considering the validation of remarks. Certainly, everyone has a right to their own opinion but not their own facts.

Text Only | Photo Reprints

AP Video
Fighting Blocks Access to Ukraine Crash Site Dangerous Bacteria Kills One in Florida Workers Dig for Survivors After India Landslide Texas Scientists Study Ebola Virus Smartphone Powered Paper Plane Debuts at Airshow Southern Accent Reduction Class Cancelled in TN Raw: Deadly Landslide Hits Indian Village Obama Chides House GOP for Pursuing Lawsuit New Bill Aims to Curb Sexual Assault on Campus Russia Counts Cost of New US, EU Sanctions 3Doodler Bring 3-D Printing to Your Hand Six PA Cops Indicted for Robbing Drug Dealers Britain Testing Driverless Cars on Roadways Raw: Thousands Flocking to German Crop Circle At Least 20 Chikungunya Cases in New Jersey Raw: Obama Eats Ribs in Kansas City In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast Raw: Otters Enjoy Water Slides at Japan Zoo NCAA Settles Head-injury Suit, Will Change Rules Raw: Amphibious Landing Practice in Hawaii
Comments Tracker
Roll Call
Helium debate