SalemNews.com, Salem, MA

Opinion

February 22, 2013

Our view: Why replacing a senator isn't cheap

Replacing John Kerry in the U.S. Senate will cost at least $13.5 million. That’s a ridiculous sum of money for Massachusetts taxpayers to have to spend. They can thank Democratic political shenanigans for it.

The expense comes after Kerry resigned his seat on Feb. 1 to become secretary of state in the Obama administration.

Gov. Deval Patrick chose former chief of staff and longtime adviser William “Mo” Cowan to serve as interim senator until a special election can be held. Party primaries will be on April 30, and the special election will be June 25.

State Auditor Suzanne Bump estimated that the cost to cities and towns of holding the elections will be $8.3 million. And Massachusetts Secretary of State William Galvin, who oversees state elections, said last week that he will ask the Legislature for $5.2 million to cover his office’s costs.

That’s $13.5 million to put a senator into office for 18 months. Kerry’s term expires in January 2015. The newly elected senator will face re-election in November 2014. That figure, of course, does not count the tens of millions of campaign dollars the candidates themselves will spend to win a job that pays $174,000 a year. Last year, Democrat Elizabeth Warren and Republican Scott Brown together spent $77 million on their Senate contest.

It wasn’t always like this. Once, the governor would handpick a successor to fill a Senate vacancy. If those rules still applied, we’d have Sen. Mo Cowan until January 2015.

But everything changed in 2004, when it looked like John Kerry might be elected president of the United States. Republican Mitt Romney was governor back then, and the Democrats running the state Legislature rebelled at the idea of Romney appointing a Republican to represent Massachusetts in the Senate. Heavens, no!

So our Democratic legislators did what any high-minded elected officials would do to serve the interests of the people they were sworn to represent ... yeah, right! Here’s what they really did: They changed the law to serve their own partisan political interests. No longer would a gubernatorial appointment be sufficient to fill a Senate vacancy. Now, an election would be required. Our Democratic leaders were confident that, in a general election, a Democratic Senate candidate would mop the floor with a Republican challenger.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion

AP Video
Raw: Japanese Soldiers Storm Beach in Exercises Raw: Weapons Fire Hits UN School in Gaza Raw: Rocket Launches Into Space With Cargo Ship Broken Water Main Floods UCLA Two Women Narrowly Avoid Being Hit by Train In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast New Sanctions on Key Sectors of Russian Economy Crayola Announces Family Attraction in Orlando US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue
Comments Tracker
Roll Call
Helium debate
Helium