SalemNews.com, Salem, MA

Opinion

October 6, 2012

Letter: MassDOT listening to Danvers concerns

To the editor:

I am writing in response to the Sept. 6 editorial entitled “Traffic mess in Danvers must be addressed.” The MassDOT Highway Division shares many of the constructive comments and concerns expressed in that article as well as those that have been provided through our online “Feedback” system or through state and local elected officials. As alluded to in the article, one of the primary goals of this project was to improve the safety for regional traffic entering and exiting Route 128. The existing interchange configuration was substandard and presented some very real safety challenges that warranted improvement. Notwithstanding, the Highway Division is focused on developing and implementing projects that improve the quality of life for all of those that use our facilities and we are keenly aware of the need to accomplish this in a manner that does not create new safety concerns and congestion.

Though the project design included widening along Route 62 and Route 35, it was constrained by the available width beneath the Route 128 bridges. The design using a series of closely spaced traffic signals to allow drivers to enter and exit the ramps at these interchanges is complex to be sure. There has been congestion and inefficiencies that have occurred since the traffic signal systems were put into full operation earlier this summer. Some of that can be attributed to the fact that the project remains unfinished with ongoing construction activities. Also, the coordination of the signals may also be impacted by construction on the part of other entities. However, it is clear that there are some larger issues at hand. Initial efforts focused on fine tuning the existing settings to improve the coordination amongst the traffic signals. Although those efforts resulted in some improvement, clearly it has not been enough.

MassDOT is listening to your concerns. Along with our consultants, we are currently collecting new traffic count data for the peak commuting periods and over 24 hour periods. The morning and afternoon peak period counts are being taken this week and the 24 hour counts will follow in the coming weeks. This data will provide fresh information that will be used to analyze and develop the optimal lane use and traffic signal settings for the corridor during peak commuting periods and for times during the day and evening when traffic volumes may be different.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion

AP Video
Raw: Families Travel to Taiwan Plane Crash Site Arizona Execution Takes Almost Two Hours Gen. Odierno Discusses Ukraine, NATO at Forum Gaza Fighting Rages Amid Cease-Fire Efforts Mint Gives JFK Coin a Face-lift Creative Makeovers for Ugly Cellphone Towers Ariz. Inmate Dies 2 Hours After Execution Began Crash Kills Teen Pilot Seeking World Record LeBron James Sends Apology Treat to Neighbors Raw: Funeral for Man Who Died in NYPD Custody Migrants Back in Honduras After US Deports Israeli American Reservist Torn Over Return Raw: ISS Cargo Ship Launches in Kazakhstan Six Indicted in StubHub Hacking Scheme Former NTSB Official: FAA Ban 'prudent' EPA Gets Hip With Kardashian Tweet Bodies of MH17 Victims Arrive in the Netherlands Biden Decries Voting Restrictions in NAACP Talk Broncos Owner Steps Down Due to Alzheimer's US, UN Push Shuttle Diplomacy in Mideast
Comments Tracker
Roll Call
Helium debate
Helium