SalemNews.com, Salem, MA

Opinion

October 29, 2012

Letter: In support of John Tierney

To the editor:

I first met John Tierney in 1995 when he asked if I would consider helping him in his run for Congress. I agreed and have chaired the finance committee for his successful campaigns since then. Over this time, I’ve consistently found John to be a bright, hardworking, honest fellow, and a passionate and effective representative for our district. Despite the power and glitter of the position, he’s also never changed, remaining the same down-to-earth guy from a modest, middle-class family.

Given what I know about John, it pains me to see him attacked, and so unfairly and savagely in this campaign. I say “unfair” because the assertion that John knew of the crimes of his brothers-in-law and his wife’s “willful blindness” is just not true. If there was even a scintilla of evidence against him, be assured that the zealous federal prosecutor who pursued John’s wife would have included a sitting congressman in those indictments in a heartbeat. Furthermore, the federal District Court judge in Patrice Tierney’s case went so far as to state on the record that John Tierney had no involvement whatsoever in the matter. Yet John’s Republican opponent, sensing a political opportunity, has made John’s “involvement” the centerpiece of his campaign supported by a $3 million nasty advertising blitz from the far-right Republican “Young Guns” Super PAC of Paul Ryan and Eric Cantor.

The focus of this election, however, shouldn’t be about John Tierney’s family or about Richard Tisei’s father and mother or his sister and their problems. Rather, it needs to be about our families and how they are affected by the enormous differences between the Democratic and Republican parties on the great issues of the day. Democrats support investing in affordable and accessible education and job retraining, adequate funding for Medicare and Social Security, and rebuilding our public infrastructure, while Republicans would greatly reduce or eliminate such support to fund further tax cuts for the wealthy and additional trillions for the military budget that the military leadership has not requested. Democrats support a tax policy where everyone, including the very wealthy, fairly shares the burden, while the Republican party insists on extending the Bush tax cuts to ensure the Romneys of the world a tax rate of 14 percent on $20 million, while their secretaries pay twice that. Democrats support equal rights for women, including pay and control of their bodies and Roe v. Wade, while the Republican party supports none of that. Democrats support regulations and oversight over big business, including Wall Street, while the Republican party does not, claiming it stifles business. Democrats support a foreign policy that emphasizes cooperation, discussion and negotiation, while the Republicans insist on an aggressive “my way or the highway” posture.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion

AP Video
Captain of Sunken SKorean Ferry Arrested Raw: Fire Destroys 3 N.J. Beachfront Homes Raw: Pope Presides Over Good Friday Mass Raw: Space X Launches to Space Station Superheroes Descend on Capitol Mall Man Charged in Kansas City Highway Shootings Obama Awards Navy Football Trophy Anti-semitic Leaflets Posted in Eastern Ukraine Raw: Magnitude-7.2 Earthquake Shakes Mexico City Ceremony at MIT Remembers One of Boston's Finest Raw: Students Hurt in Colo. School Bus Crash Raw: Church Tries for Record With Chalk Jesus Raw: Faithful Celebrate Good Friday Worldwide Deadly Avalanche Sweeps Slopes of Mount Everest Police Arrest Suspect in Highway Shootings Drought Concerns May Hurt Lake Tourism Vermont Goat Meat Gives Refugees Taste of Home Calif. Investigators Re-construct Fatal Bus Cras Mayor Rob Ford Launches Re-election Campaign Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case
Comments Tracker
Roll Call
Helium debate
Helium