SalemNews.com, Salem, MA

Opinion

February 25, 2013

Letter: No ‘nefarious intent’ in meeting with slots developer

(Continued)

In my response here, I speak only for myself. In fact, I have had NO discussion with the other board members about what they asked, heard or felt. And what was discussed in my meeting has not convinced me that there is sufficient benefit to the town to outweigh potential issues, but my role is to hear all sides of the issue, weigh the information and make a decision that benefits the entire town. I have high concerns and few details, and I am waiting, like everyone else, to see the public presentation.

There was no nefarious intent in the meetings held, they were designed to both obey the law and get the concerns out on the table so the developer can provide specific answers. You want answers, and they wanted to know what questions would be asked. So each selectman, individually, told them.

Until then, all of us, including the selectmen, have to wait and wonder.

Gardner S. Trask III

Selectman

Danvers

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion

AP Video
13 Struck by Lightning on Calif. Beach Baseball Hall of Famers Inducted Israel, Hamas Trade Fire Despite Truce in Gaza Italy's Nibali Set to Win First Tour De France Raw: Shipwrecked Concordia Completes Last Voyage Raw: Sea Turtle Hatchlings Emerge From Nest Raw: Massive Dust Storm Covers Phoenix 12-hour Cease-fire in Gaza Fighting Begins Raw: Bolivian Dancers Attempt to Break Record Raw: Israel, Palestine Supporters Rally in US Raw: Air Algerie Flight 5017 Wreckage Virginia Governor Tours Tornado Aftermath Judge Faces Heat Over Offer to Help Migrant Kids Kangaroo Goes Missing in Oklahoma More M17 Bodies Return, Sanctions on Russia Grow Raw: Deadly Tornado Hits Virginia Campground Ohio State Marching Band Chief Fired After Probe Raw: Big Rig Stuck in Illinois Swamp
Comments Tracker
Roll Call
Helium debate
Helium