Salem’s School Committee made a wise decision Monday to delay its vote on eliminating Saltonstall School’s extended-year calendar. There’s no way to make a good decision without knowing what kind of summer enrichment program would replace it.
Still, it’s just delaying the inevitable outcry. Because no matter how interesting or enriching an optional new summer program would be, it will not be the same — and could never really replace — the current Saltonstall schedule.
The popular schedule has 10 extra days a year and uses a different calendar that extends the school year to the end of July. Instead of a two-month summer vacation, Saltonstall students take just one month off, in August.
It’s easy to sympathize with the reasoning behind the proposal to end Saltonstall’s special status. Salem’s public schools are in crisis mode, and Bentley Elementary School is under a state deadline to improve its test scores. So every dollar is being scrutinized, and every dollar is needed to try to improve all of the schools, not just one of them.
Saltonstall’s extended year, while popular, hasn’t translated into dramatic achievements on state tests, but it costs an estimated $100,000 a year — and that’s left it vulnerable to budget cutters. It’s also a matter of equity; in a system in crisis, one school is getting a greater share of the resources than others, even though it’s a school with fewer at-risk children.
What we’ve heard over and over, literally for years now, is that children need more time on learning. Many kids lose a significant part of what they learn over the traditional, two-month summer vacation. And that vacation, derived from agricultural needs a century ago, doesn’t meet the needs of modern families, most of whom have both parents working. So it makes little sense to take away a benefit from several hundred families, when it’s exactly the kind of innovation most educators really would like to see extended to everyone.