SalemNews.com, Salem, MA

Opinion

April 15, 2013

Letter: Protecting our drinking water supply

(Continued)

The updated, amended, proposed overlay district includes changes that:

delineate the watershed using the latest technology;

delineate three zones of protection, Zones A, B, and C;

add definitions to the ordinance so it can be a “stand-alone ordinance” and people who live within the watershed may get a copy to educate themselves about regulations concerning properties within the district;

designate an enforcement officer and enforcement measures to be taken when necessary;

further clarify uses that are prohibited and uses that are permitted by right and by special permit;

protect groundwater and the one remaining aquifer that is also a part of the watershed.

In January 2012 the City Council’s Committee on Legal Affairs recommended that an informal committee be created to discuss questions and opinions posed by other city agencies, including the Salem and Beverly Water Supply Board and the Airport Commission. The committee worked for more than a year to make recommendations to improve the document.

A number of joint Council/Planning Board public hearings were then held. During one of those, we hit a brick wall when Beverly’s city planner threw out over a year’s worth of work to completely change every aspect of the committee’s revised document. Subsequently, the Salem and Beverly Water Supply Board stated that it must do a study to determine if the Department of Environmental Protection is correct in its mapping of the watershed and its recommendations to protect our watershed. ... Thus the public hearing had to be postponed from November 2012 to April 2013.

Why has this process taken so long? And what is the purpose of these delays? These are serious questions that need to be answered by our city government.

Protection for our public drinking water supply is a quality-of-life issue. Our potable water supply needs protection from industrial development and potential airport expansion. We do not have enough flow from groundwater as a result of too much impervious surface that prevents water from being absorbed in the ground.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion

AP Video
Ariz. Inmate Dies 2 Hours After Execution Began Crash Kills Teen Pilot Seeking World Record LeBron James Sends Apology Treat to Neighbors Raw: Funeral for Man Who Died in NYPD Custody Migrants Back in Honduras After US Deports Israeli American Reservist Torn Over Return Raw: ISS Cargo Ship Launches in Kazakhstan Six Indicted in StubHub Hacking Scheme Former NTSB Official: FAA Ban 'prudent' EPA Gets Hip With Kardashian Tweet Bodies of MH17 Victims Arrive in the Netherlands Biden Decries Voting Restrictions in NAACP Talk Broncos Owner Steps Down Due to Alzheimer's US, UN Push Shuttle Diplomacy in Mideast Trump: DC Hotel Will Be Among World's Best Plane Crashes in Taiwan, Dozens Feared Dead Republicans Hold a Hearing on IRS Lost Emails Raw: Mourners Gather As MH17 Bodies Transported Robot Parking Valet Creates Stress-free Travel Raw: Fight Breaks Out in Ukraine Parliament
Comments Tracker
Roll Call
Helium debate
Helium