SalemNews.com, Salem, MA

Opinion

May 17, 2014

Shribman: Who is qualified to be president?

(Continued)

In the post-war period, only three presidents have been indisputably qualified in the traditional way to hold the office they won.

One was Dwight D. Eisenhower, who commanded Allied forces in Europe — a dozen generals have become president — and had served as an Ivy League university president. One was Richard M. Nixon, who served in the House, Senate and as vice president for two tumultuous terms (and still was defeated in 1960 by a candidate regarded as unqualified in the customary manner, John F. Kennedy, before he rebounded to win the White House eight years later). And one was George H.W. Bush, who served in the House, was chairman of the Republican National Committee, director of Central Intelligence, chief U.S. diplomat both in Beijing and at the United Nations, and then was a two-term vice president.

The rest have been political gambles made by the American people.

Kennedy in fact was — here’s a new concept — among the least unqualified presidents of the period, a World War II veteran with six years in the House and eight in the Senate, but a slim record on Capitol Hill. He rates a slight advantage, by virtue of his slender foreign-policy experience, over four governors with no foreign policy experience whatsoever: Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.

The truth is that there is no formula for presidential success, or even for presidential electability.

No major American political party in recent history has nominated a leader remotely like Canada’s Michael Ignatieff, whose native roots had been severed by time abroad and whose Liberal Party effort was defeated three years ago. But the United States has been remarkably open to political outsiders — indeed, the post-Watergate era has given special favor to outsiders.

These outsiders often have been governors who — and here Reagan and Clinton, both leaders of Sun Belt states, come to mind — luxuriated in, and often exaggerated, their outsider status. Reagan was a conservative in a party that had repeatedly nominated moderates, and Clinton was a moderate in a party that had repeatedly nominated liberals.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion

AP Video
Crash Kills Teen Pilot Seeking World Record LeBron James Sends Apology Treat to Neighbors Raw: Funeral for Man Who Died in NYPD Custody Migrants Back in Honduras After US Deports Israeli American Reservist Torn Over Return Raw: ISS Cargo Ship Launches in Kazakhstan Six Indicted in StubHub Hacking Scheme Former NTSB Official: FAA Ban 'prudent' EPA Gets Hip With Kardashian Tweet Bodies of MH17 Victims Arrive in the Netherlands Biden Decries Voting Restrictions in NAACP Talk Broncos Owner Steps Down Due to Alzheimer's US, UN Push Shuttle Diplomacy in Mideast Trump: DC Hotel Will Be Among World's Best Plane Crashes in Taiwan, Dozens Feared Dead Republicans Hold a Hearing on IRS Lost Emails Raw: Mourners Gather As MH17 Bodies Transported Robot Parking Valet Creates Stress-free Travel Raw: Fight Breaks Out in Ukraine Parliament Disabled Veterans Memorial Nearing Completion
Comments Tracker
Roll Call
Helium debate
Helium