If anyone out there working in the private sector has sick leave buyback benefits, we’ve never heard about it.
Most people haven’t.
It’s a perk that’s granted almost exclusively to public employee unions around the country, meant to encourage them not to be dishonest by calling in sick when they’re not.
The thinking goes that no matter how many paid sick days an employer offers — five, 10, 15 a year — employees will take every one of them whether they’re sick or not, creating headaches for those who need to keep firetrucks manned and teachers in the classroom.
Thus, an incentive. Public employees can cash in unused sick days when they leave, to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars. That means taxpayers effectively pay them twice — once for the hours they worked, and a second time for not cheating.
It’s faulty thinking, of course. Those of us in the private sector know that most workers don’t have to be paid extra to be honest. They will take time off when they’re sick and will come to work when they’re well.
We think public employees are no different; they’re honest and hardworking, and they don’t need special incentives to encourage them to stay that way.
So we’re glad to see Salem Mayor Kim Driscoll targeting this bizarre perk in the current round of union negotiations.
Driscoll rightly points out that current union members are not to blame for this system; they’re simply accepting a benefit for which they have bargained in good faith. Many have probably factored those big sick-leave windfalls into their retirement planning, so the system can’t be dismantled abruptly.
But this is a system that creates havoc for budget planners, who can be socked with hundreds of thousands of dollars in payments that cannot be planned for in advance. It’s a system that’s unfair to taxpayers, who must pay millions of dollars for a benefit they will never see themselves.