SalemNews.com, Salem, MA

Opinion

August 8, 2013

Watson: Government collects data to look for threats

I find myself feeling ambivalent in the current debate about the Patriot Act and the data-collection activities of our national intelligence agencies. What is the right balance between privacy and surveillance, between reasonable individual agency and reasonable security?

Those are difficult questions, and I doubt that the answers lie at either extreme. Some people fear the government inordinately and believe that its data collection is either a deliberate power-grab or part of a long, slow march to erode our freedoms. Others fully trust the government not to abuse its power or they accept almost all intelligence measures deemed necessary by the state to ensure security. But probably, healthy, prudent intelligence protocols should fall somewhere between those two postures.

The original Patriot Act was passed on October 26, 2001, in the emotionally charged aftermath of 9/11. Probably, it could have used more refinement and more oversight provisions. It has been amended by legislation and the courts a number of times. Still, its 342 pages contain gray areas, loopholes and parts subject to interpretation (inevitably, like most complex laws).

The act enlarged the powers of the federal government to search, seize, detain and wiretap. It lowered the standards by which search warrants or wiretap orders are obtained, it narrowed the scope of what the intelligence agencies must disclose, and it broadened definitions of domestic terrorism. The act also made it easier for authorities to detain and indefinitely hold suspects, deny access to legal counsel, and harass or intimidate immigrants, citizens and businesses.

Prior to the Patriot Act, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978 was the primary arbiter of the legality of various intelligence activities. However, FISA was not enacted in response to threats from abroad, but in response to President Nixon’s abuse of federal intelligence resources to monitor and investigate American individuals and groups that were considered — by Nixon or the intelligence agencies — dangerous, unpatriotic or politically radical. Those groups included Vietnam War protesters, anti-nuke activists, environmental advocates, “longhairs” and mere political opponents.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion

AP Video
Johnson: Six Arrests, No Tear Gas in Ferguson Raw: Rescue, Relief Efforts at Japan Landslide Cadavers, a Teen, and a Medical School Dream Raw: Woman Escorted From Ferguson Protests California Drought Stings Honeybees, Beekeepers Officer Who Pointed Gun at Protesters Suspended Holder Hopes to Bring Calm to Ferguson Today in History August 21 Holder Pledges Top Investigators for Ferguson US Mission to Rescue Hostages in Syria Failed Manfred, Torre and MLB Take Ice Bucket Challenge Bank of America Reaches Record $17B Settlement Holder Reassures Ferguson Community With Visit GlobalPost CEO Remembers Foley As a Brave Man Seth Meyers Rolls Out Emmy Red Carpet Obama: World Is Appalled by Murder of Journalist Israel, Militants Trade Fire After Talks Fail Pres. George W. Bush Takes Ice Bucket Challenge Pierce Brosnan's Call to Join the Expendables Changes Coming to No-Fly List
Comments Tracker
Roll Call
Helium debate
Helium