SalemNews.com, Salem, MA

Opinion

November 6, 2009

Letter: Marriage should be a matter of faith, not statute

To the editor:

America is facing difficult times. The economy, the wars, the ecology — these are complex problems and will require complex solutions. But there is another issue that distracts America, one that can be easily settled in a simple and fair manner — same-sex marriage.

Same-sex marriage conferred by the government horrifies religious groups. I wonder why? Religious people are usually not concerned by government regulations. The pope does not comment on zoning laws.

The reason these people are concerned is because to them, marriage is a sacred religious union.

On the other side are same-sex couples. They want the same respect, the same legal rights that the government grants to opposite-sex couples. Who can blame them? They love and respect their partners just as much. They maintain the government has no right to tell them whose marriage is legal, and whose is not.

Both sides are right. Just as the government has no place in our bedrooms, it has no place defining religious unions. Marriage is a religious union, and it's about time our constitutional right to the separation of church and state be respected. The government has no right to marry anyone; it needs to get out of the marriage business entirely.

Marriage should continue as a religious union only. If you want to marry a man, a woman, or two women or three men, who cares? Find a church, mosque, synagogue or coven that will marry you. It's not the government's place to define religion. It is the government's place to define civil unions. Any religious union, of any type, should never achieve a legal status of any sort. Civil unions alone should define any legal rights and responsibilities the members of that union are entitled to. This includes how taxes are paid, inheritances dispersed, what hospital visitation rights are allowed, etc.

Once we agree that civil unions are not religious unions, opposition by religious groups to expanded civil unions should be greatly minimized. The government can define civil unions without offense to anyone's religious sensibilities.

It's the right solution, and the right time.

John Treggiari

Salem

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion

Nelson Benton Twitter Updates
Follow me on Twitter
Salem News Opinion Poll
AP Video
Denver's Largest-Ever Drug Bust Nets Dozens Marines: No Punishment for Nazi-like Flag Vets Look to Translate Military Skills Into Jobs Expert: Removing LA School's Staff 'Appropriate' Raw Video: School Bus Burst Into Flames LA School Reopens Amid Sex Abuse Scandal $25B Settlement Reached Over Foreclosure Abuses Pentagon: Allow Women Closer to Front Lines Obama Gives Education Waivers to 10 States Giffords Aide to Run for Her Seat LA School in Sex Abuse Scandal Reopens Winter Slamming North Asia, Parts of Europe Syrian Forces Renew Bombardment of Homs States, Banks Reach Foreclosure-abuse Settlement Raw Video: Italy's Mount Etna Bursts Into Life Greeks March; Angry Despite Debt Deal Raw Video: U.S. Pullout Celebration Raw Video: Annual Empire State Building Run-Up Man Killed in Courthouse Shootout Air Force Airlines: Leaders Get Polished Service
Comments Tracker
Roll Call
Helium debate
Helium