SalemNews.com, Salem, MA

Opinion

January 21, 2014

Letter: Brimbal Avenue development is appropriate, needed

To the editor:

Thank you for your coverage of the Brimbal Avenue interchange project in Beverly. This is an important issue, not just for the immediate neighborhood or the city of Beverly, but for the entire region. Unfortunately, I think that a relatively small group of people is attempting to elevate a minor and temporary inconvenience into a permanent and irresolvable regional problem.

The Jacobs Engineering traffic study uses both a figure of an increase of 300 vehicles per peak hour and one of an increase of 30 vehicles per peak hour. The figure of 300 vehicles per peak hour includes all additional traffic that will be generated by this project, whether or not those vehicles will impact the residential portions of Brimbal Avenue and the adjacent neighborhoods. The relevant figure is the number of cars that will impact these residential areas. That figure is 30 vehicles per peak hour. And everyone seems to agree that after the completion of Phase II of the project, traffic on Brimbal Avenue will be reduced to below current levels.

This brings us to problem of additional lights and the addition of two roundabouts on Brimbal Avenue.

Residents have expressed the fear that these features will prove an inconvenience. They are probably right, but we must ask the question: What does this inconvenience buy? The answer is increased road safety. Lights and roundabouts are both traffic-calming mechanisms, meaning that traffic along Brimbal Avenue will be slowed and safer. Children will have lights with which they can cross a street that we all know now is not terribly safe to cross. Improved safety is what is bought for the “inconvenience” of traffic-calming measures.

Economic development is not a minor issue. The opponents of this project point out that no commercial development has lowered residential taxes, and surrounding communities (such as Hamilton, Wenham and Manchester-by-the-Sea) get along just fine without commercial development. Both points are extremely misleading. People understand that their own household expenses rise every year. Municipal expenses rise every year, as well. The city has the following choices: cut services, raise residential and commercial real estate taxes, or encourage new commercial development.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion

AP Video
Arizona Prison Chief: Execution Wasn't Botched Calif. Police Investigate Peacock Shooting Death Raw: Protesters, Soldiers Clash in West Bank Police: Doctor Who Shot Gunman 'Saved Lives' 'Modern Family' Star on Gay Athletes Coming Out MN Twins Debut Beer Vending Machine DA: Pa. Doctor Fired Back at Hospital Gunman Raw: Iowa Police Dash Cam Shows Wild Chase Obama Seeks Limits on US Company Mergers Abroad Large Family to Share NJ Lottery Winnings U.S. Flights to Israel Resume After Ban Lifted Official: Air Algerie Flight 'probably Crashed' TSA Administrator on Politics and Flight Bans Raw: National Guard Helps Battle WA Wildfires Raw: Ukraine's Donetsk Residents Flee Senators Push to End Hamas Threat in Cease-Fire A Young Victim's Premonition, Hug Before MH17 Raw: Deadly Storm Hits Virginia Campground Death Penalty Expert: 'This is a Turning Point' Raw: MH17 Victim's Bodies Arrive in Netherlands
Comments Tracker
Roll Call
Helium debate
Helium