As you know, we’re almost at the end of the election cycle of 2012. It affects us on county, state and national levels, so let’s have one last hard look.
President Barack Obama vs. Mitt Romney: Mitt Romney wants to take the reins of the assets of the United States and says he “believes in America” and wants to create jobs for Americans. He says he’s the one who should be trusted to control the United States Treasury and majorly influence the country’s financial markets.
However, Romney keeps the majority of his assets outside the United States’ borders, in Switzerland, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands. I don’t see where this shows much faith in the United States. This is a harbinger of what Romney and his supporters would do if they gain control of the country. He’s one of the major trendsetters in creating jobs offshore and eliminating defined pension plans in the private sector. When Barack Obama took office in January 2009, the economy was a downhill, full-throttle, out-of-control runaway train. Under these desperate conditions, he did his level best with an impending economic disaster and avoided calamity. He ended the war in Iraq, made sure bin Laden wasn’t wasting any more of our oxygen, started winding down Afghanistan and, though being hamstrung by an obstructionist, right-wing Congress, he has helped to create several million jobs.
Sen. Scott Brown vs. Elizabeth Warren: Based upon the facts of Scott Brown’s voting record, I can’t believe that this race is so close. When it comes to actually helping the country, as opposed to helping the top 2 or 3 percent, Brown is invisible. Regarding the financial markets, women’s rights, jobs creation and protecting the environment, his overall voting record is obeisance to the elite, which means the Republican ticket, although he claims to be independent. His average for voting Republican is 85 percent. That isn’t “bipartisan” by the wildest stretch of the imagination.