In the wake of the Sandy Hook school shooting, buried in the often-hyperbolic arguments over gun control or gun freedom, there initially was some talk about looking at mental health care in this country.
Finally, it appeared there would be a serious effort to address a long-neglected health concern in America, a concern that gets little attention from politicians or media — except in a negative way.
Sadly, rather than use this critical time for thoughtful review, national media and political leaders are positioning themselves on gun control issues that is a much easier pro-con, “them versus us” issue to debate than the less sexy issue of mental health reform.
However, two lawmakers are trying to break from that herd mentality. U.S. Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., and U.S. Rep. Richard Nugent, R-Fla., have co-authored a bill that will expand funding for crisis intervention teams, mental health courts and law enforcement training. Franken said that although he heard a lot of people talk about mental health after the Newtown incident, “I felt it was unfortunately just kind of a talking point.”
Nugent is taking a different tack, saying it’s time to stop sending billions of dollars to foreign countries and use the money for the states to help cope with mental illness. “The federal government should not be running mental health care, but the feds should put money toward block granting states with achievable results to combat the root cause of these people killing each other,” he said.
Nugent said banning assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines is not the answer. “That’s a bumper-sticker approach to a very serious problem,” he said.
Franken acknowledged that addressing the problem will cost in the short run but may save money in the long run. One area of savings would be with the criminal justice system, where mental illness has not been addressed for too long.