To the editor:
While I’ve not met Wes Slate, I am aware of his work on the Beverly City Council over the last half dozen years, during all of which I have been a Beverly resident and voter. But I have read his mail drop piece, which arrived yesterday.
It made me sad, even though we’ve all grown accustomed to vitriol in our national politics. In general, the consequence of this unhealthy circumstance has typically been to see more responsible and thoughtful leadership occur at the state (sometimes) and municipal (often) levels. Yet his piece provides virtually no substantive basis (other than economic development platitudes about which there is no debate or disagreement with his opponent) for understanding him, his priorities, his plan, his policies or his principles.
It also made me angry. Because, while he aims to denigrate his opponent, he is really insulting the citizens of Beverly. If Mike Cahill is so bad, why did we elect him and re-elect him to the state Legislature five times, always by overwhelming margins? If he is so bad, why did we elect him to the City Council as the top vote getter? If he is so bad, why did we give him nearly as many votes as the long-serving, now-departing incumbent mayor? Does Wes Slate really believe we — Beverly’s residents and voters — are so inattentive and incompetent to have been so badly fooled so many times?
We were not fooled because Mike Cahill has been and can continue to be an excellent leader for our city. As a state representative, Mike Cahill helped the citizens of Beverly with important constituent services (I saw this personally as a senior state administration official) and served the public’s best interests by overseeing critical legislative reforms (I understood this as an observant citizen). These produced results, with new projects in Beverly and useful assistance for Beverly, its businesses, citizens and schools.